UK politicians are all aboard for the autonomous car revolution but what should you know about driverless cars now?
The UK Government is frequently criticised for being slow, cumbersome and paralysed by red tape, but its desire to make the UK the global centre for autonomous car technology is a far cry from that.
Just six months ago, ministers announced £19million would be ploughed into driverless car research, and we have three working prototypes that will begin testing this year. There’s also an official code of practice for testing driverless cars on UK roads published by the Department for Transport (DfT).
Trouble is, the UK is already behind the autonomous car pace. Google has its well developed vehicle testing openly in the US, while Volvo is the leading manufacturer at its base in Sweden. Audi isn’t far behind, while tech-savvy Japanese makers are advanced, too.
Business Secretary Vince Cable told Auto Express this is what makes the UK the ideal test bed compared to rival countries. “In the US and continental Europe, they don’t at the moment have regulatory framework to make it possible, which we do,” he said.
“I think the other good thing is that in the UK we’re developing the technology in parallel with a proper understanding of the rules and regulations.”
These rules and regulations form part of the Government’s ‘Pathway to Driverless Cars’ review, which lays out the various challenges the industry will need to overcome, including insurance policies, driving licences and car maintenance.
Beyond the legal issues, though, is the technology. Recently, the UK has enjoyed a rise in car production, with Nissan expanding in Sunderland, Bentley growing in Crewe, Cheshire, and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) continuing to invest heavily in the Midlands.
Transport minister Claire Perry added: “I would like to make Britain the centre of autonomous vehicle manufacture. We know all major manufacturers are interested and, as the review has shown, Britain is the ideal place to run trials which need to be real world.”
In fact, JLR will be heavily involved in the tests in Milton Keynes and Coventry. According to its director of research and technology, Dr Wolfgang Epple, it’s focusing on the driver as much as pedestrians and other road users. “The real-world testing will not only help us deliver a range of new advanced driver assistance technologies, but will ensure the excitement and enjoyment of driving will not be taken away,” he said.
“While the car will be able to drive itself if the driver chooses, our aim is to assist and enhance the driver – and ultimately offer levels of autonomy to suit the driver’s mood or needs on and off-road.”
So with testing approved and manufacturers backing the UK’s push to be the best, what about the technological advances? Can we beat our rivals?
Antony Waldock, technical lead on the Bristol trial, which starts in April, certainly thinks so. He told us: “We’re taking tech from UK universities, plus small and large companies, and putting it on to the vehicle and understanding how it would work in Bristol.”
Antony will oversee a BAE-developed Bowler Wildcat to determine which systems work best for operating a driverless vehicle. So what makes the UK so special?
“I think we have a real opportunity,” Antony added. “The Google car is focused on the spinning roof sensor, but that doesn’t work in fog, mist and rain, and that’s why Google only tests in California. We’re looking at radar camera solutions and therefore we can start to develop systems to use in all weathers.”
For once, then, the British weather is better than California’s, and the UK looks all set for a driverless revolution – but when will motorists be able to hand over control for their daily commute?
Domestic laws won’t be amended until summer 2017 and EU regulations are unlikely to be changed before the end of 2018. So it’s likely to be the next decade before a fully automated vehicle is on sale here.
Still, the autonomous car industry is expected to be worth £900billion by 2025, and the UK wants a majority share. It’s a long road from Greenwich to global superpower, and the race is on. It remains to be seen whether we’ll take our hands off the wheel first.
Autonomous cars on UK roads: the code of practice
The Department for Transport (DfT) has issued a Code of Practice for how driverless cars should be tested on UK roads. It highlights procedures, requirements and recommendations for all manufacturers and organisations wishing to test fully autonomous vehicles.
While the vehicles tested will be fully automated, the new Code of Practice dictates there must be a manual override at all times. This also means that a test pilot must sit in each vehicle.
Those seeking to become testers will still need a full licence and comprehensive understanding of automated technology. There will be no reading books or catching up on e-mail either, as the Code of Practice stipulates that the tester must act as if driving the car under normal conditions.
While the testers won’t actually be driving the car, the car has to be fully insured like all other vehicles on UK public roads, and the DfT advise all manufacturers to inform local communities and law enforcement of upcoming trials.
Blaming the car for speeding won’t help with the police either, as the DfT stipulate that the cars must obey all driving laws and limits. Cars must be fitted with an event data recorder – or black box – to be able to easily analyse an accident in case the worst should happen.
Legal view on driverless cars
Developing the tech is just one hurdle before drivers will be able to hand control to their car and read the paper or have a nap at the wheel. The Government also faces a huge legal shake-up to make it a reality, with question marks over who’d be at fault in the event of a crash and if motorists would still need a licence.
Transport minister Claire Perry admitted it wouldn’t be easy, but said: “We must not be afraid to ask these questions.” So how could things change?
In the event of an accident, is the autonomous system at fault or does liability fall on the ‘driver’? Driverless cars should reduce the number of claims and subsequently bring lower insurance premiums, and the Government says if a driver can still take manual control then a conventional policy is still needed. If a car is fully autonomous, this may change and some manufacturers may choose to self-insure. Policies could be invalidated if owners fail to keep software and tech up-to-date to prevent cyber threats, however.
The Government makes a clear distinction between highly automated vehicles – for which existing licence laws remain, as you still have to take control at times – and fully automated vehicles. The latter, which are still some way away from the road, may require changes, as they may appeal to drivers who can’t or don’t wish to drive conventional cars.
EU standards will need to be updated for driverless car production, and that includes ensuring performance of automated systems can be tested cheaply and easily for the annual MoT. Issues could arise if a car can be driven manually, but the automated systems are broken – would this mean it’s roadworthy?
The Highway Code
Autonomous cars will be expected to follow current guidelines, but the Highway Code will need to change to get the most out of them. The tech will allow more accurate driving so, for example, cars could overtake cyclists more closely, while tailgating may no longer be an offence – as running driverless cars close together better uses road capacity and cuts emissions.
Source – http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-tech/85183/driverless-cars-everything-you-need-to-know-about-self-driving-vehicles